My work is done and I'll leave the office with a thought for the day:"They are a handful of miserable resuscitators of a degenerate dead religion who wish to return to the monstrous dark delusions of the past."
-Father Eustathios Kollas, on the legitimisation of Greek God worship. See guardian unlimited.
I just had a thought of my own, too. I believe (forgive the simplification) that the Buddhist way of eating is in silence, to allow the eating and taste of the food to be experienced and appreciated fully. Talking and eating together would be dividing the mind. The Christian way seems a bit more social, e.g. wine and meat and laughter and talking. If we live our lives (as many try) by the principle 'what would Jesus do?' (WWJD), we'd probably choose the later. Isn't it a bit simplistic to take the practice of Jesus or the new testament church and make it our own? Would we make the Buddhist convert to Christianity talk whilst eating, in the name of being more "Christ-like"?I can guess a response to this question. Of course Jesus if he grew up in an eastern culture would eat with a different style, possibly more "Buddhist". But then the Jesus we're takling about is a different one to the 1st Century Jew. You cannot remove someone from their cultural context; it's not them any more (unless you believe in some metaphysical appendix to the body/mind but that's another 10 minutes' discussion entirely). WWJD may be a good idea but, really, we don't live in 1st Century Palestine, nor are we all Jews - or males.So maybe we cannot base our ecclesiology on going back to the early church, nor our dinner-ology on the penchants of Jesus and his first followers.